[c-nsp] CSR1000V and CPU usage
Pshem Kowalczyk
pshem.k at gmail.com
Thu Aug 13 16:53:47 EDT 2015
Hi,
Currently we push only a small amount of bandwidth right now - the 2.5G was
during initial testing when we're assessing the performance and
scalability.
At this stage the statistics looks like this:
#show platform software status control-processor
RP0: online, statistics updated 0 seconds ago
Load Average: healthy
1-Min: 0.07, status: healthy, under 8.00
5-Min: 0.03, status: healthy, under 8.00
15-Min: 0.01, status: healthy, under 10.00
Memory (kb): healthy
Total: 2506276
Used: 2458864 (98%)
Free: 47412 (2%)
Committed: 2013860 (80%), status: healthy, under 95%
Per-core Statistics
CPU0: CPU Utilization (percentage of time spent)
User: 2.09, System: 0.99, Nice: 0.00, Idle: 96.90
IRQ: 0.00, SIRQ: 0.00, IOwait: 0.00
#show platform hardware qfp active datapath utilization
CPP 0: Subdev 0 5 secs 1 min 5 min 60 min
Input: Priority (pps) 0 0 0 0
(bps) 0 0 0 0
Non-Priority (pps) 37 26 25 24
(bps) 18776 14096 13360 13200
Total (pps) 37 26 25 24
(bps) 18776 14096 13360 13200
Output: Priority (pps) 0 0 0 0
(bps) 0 0 0 0
Non-Priority (pps) 31 20 18 18
(bps) 33400 18904 17624 17744
Total (pps) 31 20 18 18
(bps) 33400 18904 17624 17744
Processing: Load (pct) 2 2 2 2
The box pushes less then 10Mb/s right now (as with actual asr1k - only
ingress traffic counts).
Features we use:
IPSEC, MPLS (LDP)
kind regards
Pshem
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 at 02:36 Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor.net> wrote:
> On 13 Aug 2015, at 20:05, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
> > That's what we do. Works like a charm, over 12x months now.
>
> Yes, that's a perfect application for it.
>
> -----------------------------------
> Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor.net>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list