[c-nsp] CSR1000V and CPU usage

Pshem Kowalczyk pshem.k at gmail.com
Thu Aug 13 16:53:47 EDT 2015


Hi,

Currently we push only a small amount of bandwidth right now - the 2.5G was
during initial testing when we're assessing the performance and
scalability.

At this stage the statistics looks like this:

#show platform software status control-processor
RP0: online, statistics updated 0 seconds ago
Load Average: healthy
  1-Min: 0.07, status: healthy, under 8.00
  5-Min: 0.03, status: healthy, under 8.00
  15-Min: 0.01, status: healthy, under 10.00
Memory (kb): healthy
  Total: 2506276
  Used: 2458864 (98%)
  Free: 47412 (2%)
  Committed: 2013860 (80%), status: healthy, under 95%
Per-core Statistics
CPU0: CPU Utilization (percentage of time spent)
  User:  2.09, System:  0.99, Nice:  0.00, Idle: 96.90
  IRQ:  0.00, SIRQ:  0.00, IOwait:  0.00

#show platform hardware qfp active datapath utilization
  CPP 0: Subdev 0            5 secs        1 min        5 min       60 min
Input:  Priority (pps)            0            0            0            0
                 (bps)            0            0            0            0
    Non-Priority (pps)           37           26           25           24
                 (bps)        18776        14096        13360        13200
           Total (pps)           37           26           25           24
                 (bps)        18776        14096        13360        13200
Output: Priority (pps)            0            0            0            0
                 (bps)            0            0            0            0
    Non-Priority (pps)           31           20           18           18
                 (bps)        33400        18904        17624        17744
           Total (pps)           31           20           18           18
                 (bps)        33400        18904        17624        17744
Processing: Load (pct)            2            2            2            2

The box pushes less then 10Mb/s right now (as with actual asr1k - only
ingress traffic counts).

Features we use:
IPSEC, MPLS (LDP)

kind regards
Pshem




On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 at 02:36 Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor.net> wrote:

> On 13 Aug 2015, at 20:05, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
> > That's what we do. Works like a charm, over 12x months now.
>
> Yes, that's a perfect application for it.
>
> -----------------------------------
> Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor.net>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list