[c-nsp] Non Cisco SFP
Charles Sprickman
spork at bway.net
Mon Feb 2 14:28:19 EST 2015
On Feb 2, 2015, at 2:19 PM, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka at seacom.mu> wrote:
> On 2/Feb/15 18:46, Warren Jackson wrote:
>> Sure, no problem!
>>
>> 1) Lack of Cisco support. You will find yourself behind the eight-ball
>> dealing with the TAC if you have these in your chassis. Sounds like a
>> small deal, but I for one don't have the time to deal with it.
>
> I've found this not to be an issue in practice.
And if it is, it’s solved with a handful of spares per location. If you have 100 SFPs at one location and you’re saving a few hundred per SFP, keeping a few “genuine” units is a small price if you have TAC paranoia.
Charles
> Mark.
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list