[c-nsp] Non Cisco SFP

Charles Sprickman spork at bway.net
Mon Feb 2 14:28:19 EST 2015


On Feb 2, 2015, at 2:19 PM, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka at seacom.mu> wrote:

> On 2/Feb/15 18:46, Warren Jackson wrote:
>> Sure, no problem!
>> 
>> 1)  Lack of Cisco support.  You will find yourself behind the eight-ball
>> dealing with the TAC if you have these in your chassis.  Sounds like a
>> small deal, but I for one don't have the time to deal with it.
> 
> I've found this not to be an issue in practice.

And if it is, it’s solved with a handful of spares per location.  If you have 100 SFPs at one location and you’re saving a few hundred per SFP, keeping a few “genuine” units is a small price if you have TAC paranoia.

Charles

> Mark.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/




More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list