[c-nsp] [j-nsp] draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16
Gert Doering
gert at greenie.muc.de
Fri Feb 20 13:40:03 EST 2015
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 04:33:19PM +0000, Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
> And most importantly it's not actually needed it's just a whim of network operators.
You might have enough IPv4 addresses to use for your infrastructure -
many others haven't.
(And no, RFC1918 addresses and MPLS topology hiding is what leads to
disgruntled customers going elsewhere)
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 291 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20150220/4ab70211/attachment.sig>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list