[c-nsp] [j-nsp] draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 04:33:19PM +0000, Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
> And most importantly it's not actually needed it's just a whim of network operators.

You might have enough IPv4 addresses to use for your infrastructure - 
many others haven't.

(And no, RFC1918 addresses and MPLS topology hiding is what leads to
disgruntled customers going elsewhere)

gert

-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 291 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20150220/4ab70211/attachment.sig>