[c-nsp] ASR1000 QFP/ESP utilization
Łukasz Bromirski
lukasz at bromirski.net
Fri Jan 16 14:10:29 EST 2015
Chuck,
> On 15 Jan 2015, at 13:06, Chuck Church <chuckchurch at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I took that as
> meaning the % of BW against your ESP limit such as 5 gigabit in this case.
> Our two I'm looking at (both running 3.7.4) look like this (bottom 3 lines):
>
> Total (pps) 344698 357155 334210
> 340850
> (bps) 2266105832 2329040800 2187654192
> 2239088888
> Processing: Load (pct) 4 5 4
> 4
>
> The % listed is 4 or 5, yet the bps total seems to be about 2.2 gigabit, or
> approaching half of what the ESP5 should be able of doing. Should I just
> use the bps line and ignore the processing load line? I'm not sure what
> it's indicating a percentage of. The total bps line matches up pretty well
> with the 5 minute input count of all interfaces.
The processing load (percentage) is quite low, as ESP CPU may not be
tasked with lot of things to do on the traffic itself. Depending on the
features configured you may be either higher or lower.
--
"There's no sense in being precise when | Łukasz Bromirski
you don't know what you're talking | jid:lbromirski at jabber.org
about." John von Neumann | http://lukasz.bromirski.net
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list