[c-nsp] SFPs (Third party) - ordered "standard" LH, but got "ZX"

CiscoNSP List CiscoNSP_list at hotmail.com
Mon Jul 6 05:27:56 EDT 2015


...apologies....missed CC'ing the list:


Cheers Nic - This is for patching between kit in the same rack(sub 2meter patches)...if that makes any difference.


What levels should I be concerned about?


After a bit of digging, found this command for ASR1001:


show hw-module subslot 0/0 transceiver 0 status


Seeing:


 Tx power -6.0 dBm

RX optical power -6.3dBm


This port is connected to an ME3600, with a "ZX" SFP also.



________________________________________
From: Nick Hilliard <nick at foobar.org>
Sent: Monday, 6 July 2015 7:07 PM
To: CiscoNSP List; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] SFPs (Third party) - ordered "standard" LH, but got "ZX"

On 06/07/2015 09:50, CiscoNSP List wrote:
> As per title....ordered a bunch of our usual single mode SFP's. and they
> are badged as LH, but when inserted into router/switch, they report as
> ZX.....can I connect our LH to the new ZX ones (I dont have a
> router/switch handy to test), and have to ship them interstate.....but
> obviously dont want to if they are no compatible with our existing LH
> SFP's

they'll interoperate, yes.  Both transceiver types have wide-band
receivers.  Just be careful about tx/rx levels on each side: if your RX
levels are outside recommended parameters, you may end up damaging the
transceiver.

Nick



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list