[c-nsp] Cisco 7206VXR with NPE-G1
Matthew Huff
mhuff at ox.com
Wed Jul 8 08:44:25 EDT 2015
Even with “ip options drop”, we are still seeing a fraction of packets being cpu switched (about 0.2% input and 1% output) even though we are using CEF. Looks like they are mostly door-knob packets destined for the router itself (which is ACL’d) or some other annoyance. We tuned the buffers to solve the cosmetic counter issue with input/output errors. Since we increased the buffers, the counters have been clean, and the “show buffers” did show a shortage of buffers, so even on the 7200 with particles, perhaps the CLI uses the buffers construct regardless. Maybe it was just a placebo effect.
rtr-inet2#sh int gi0/1 stats
GigabitEthernet0/1
Switching path Pkts In Chars In Pkts Out Chars Out
Processor 2824573 677403057 2958521 196941357
Route cache 944226953 181329390 274701286 1591461341
Total 947051526 858732447 277659807 1788402698
rtr-inet2#sh ip cef switching statistics
Path Reason Drop Punt Punt2Host
RP LES Packet destined for us 0 4377823 0
RP LES Total 0 4377823 0
RP PAS No route 3923 0 0
RP PAS Packet destined for us 0 4933417 8
RP PAS No adjacency 3476 0 0
RP PAS Incomplete adjacency 1204250 0 0
RP PAS TTL expired 0 0 2709278
RP PAS Routed to Null0 392389023 0 0
RP PAS Features 151528682 0 22614
RP PAS IP redirects 0 0 12358
RP PAS Neighbor resolution req 399660 0 0
RP PAS Total 545529014 4933417 2744258
All Total 545529014 9311240 2744258
On Jul 8, 2015, at 4:13 AM, Lukas Tribus <luky-37 at hotmail.com<mailto:luky-37 at hotmail.com>> wrote:
"on a 10000". The 7200 uses particles, not buffers...
Also, its not relevant for CEF-switched traffic. So unless your configuration
requires fast-switching or process-switching, you don't need to worry about
buffer/particle tuning at all.
Lukas
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list