[c-nsp] Shaping pseudowire on ME3600->ME3600 (L2)

[Adam Vitkovsky]

Hi,

Yes you can shape under the service instance configured with "xconnect"
If I recall correctly pure shaping can be done at parent level but priority and cbwfq has to be done at child level.  

policy-map vpn1_voice_child_out
 class voip_vpn1
  police cir 64000
   conform-action transmit 
   exceed-action drop 
  priority level 1
 class class-default

policy-map vpn1_voice_parent_out
 class class-default
  shape average 1024000
   service-policy vpn1_voice_child_out

adam
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> CiscoNSP List
> Sent: 08 July 2015 01:16
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [c-nsp] Shaping pseudowire on ME3600->ME3600 (L2)
> 
> 
> Hi Everyone,
> 
> 
> 
> Question (As I dont have a pair of 3600's handy that I can test on until later in
> the week), but can you shape a L2 x-connect? (I assume you can, as Ive done
> it with service instance for a VRF, but not for a "L2" service?)
> 
> 
> 
> i.e.
> 
> 
> 
> policy-map 20M
> 
> 
>  class class-default
> 
> 
>   shape average 20000000
> 
> 
> 
> int foo
> 
> 
>  service instance 204 ethernet
> 
> 
>   description PW_TEST_L2_SHAPE
> 
> 
>   encapsulation dot1q 204
> 
> 
>   rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
> 
> 
>   xconnect xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 1403241631 encapsulation mpls
> 
> 
>   service-policy output 20Mb
> 
> 
> 
> Cheers.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/