[c-nsp] VPLS BGP Signaling
Mohammad Khalil
eng_mssk at hotmail.com
Sun Jul 26 09:45:05 EDT 2015
Hi Nick/AllSorry for the bad format
Is it readable now?
BR,Mohammad
-----------------
Hi all
I have two CSR1000v boxes which am trying to establish several VPLS combinations for connectivity between two switches
All combinations worked perfectly except for BGP signaling (all the previous setups depend on LDP as a signaling
protocol)
CSR1,CSR2
l2vpn vfi context VFIB
vpn id 105
autodiscovery bgp signaling bgp
ve id 105
ve range 55
route-target export 1:1
route-target import 1:1
bridge-domain 105
member GigabitEthernet2 service-instance 105
member vfi VFIB
interface GigabitEthernet2
no ip address
negotiation auto
service instance 105 ethernet
encapsulation dot1q 105
ASR1#sh xconnect all
Legend: XC ST=Xconnect State S1=Segment1 State S2=Segment2 State
UP=Up DN=Down AD=Admin Down IA=Inactive
SB=Standby HS=Hot Standby RV=Recovering NH=No Hardware
XC ST Segment 1 S1 Segment 2 S2
------+---------------------------------+--+---------------------------------+--
-- pri vfi VFIB UP unkn Invalid Segment --
UP pri bd 105 UP vfi VFIB UP
ASR1#show bgp l2vpn vpls all
BGP table version is 5, local router ID is 1.1.1.1
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,
r RIB-failure, S Stale, m multipath, b backup-path, f RT-Filter,
x best-external, a additional-path, c RIB-compressed,
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
RPKI validation codes: V valid, I invalid, N Not found
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
Route Distinguisher: 1:105
* i 1:105:VEID-105:Blk-55/136
3.3.3.3 0 100 0 ?
*> 0.0.0.0 32768 ?
No ping between the two hosts
ASR1#sh run | sec router bgp
router bgp 1
bgp log-neighbor-changes
no bgp default ipv4-unicast
neighbor 3.3.3.3 remote-as 1
neighbor 3.3.3.3 update-source Loopback0
!
address-family ipv4
exit-address-family
!
address-family l2vpn vpls
neighbor 3.3.3.3 activate
neighbor 3.3.3.3 send-community both
neighbor 3.3.3.3 suppress-signaling-protocol ldp
exit-address-family
Any ideas?
Thanks
BR,
Mohammad
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list