[c-nsp] ASR920 - ISR4431

[Gustav Ulander]

Hello Waris.
Yepp we looked at it but we can not provide access to some of our hardware to this and then the point is more or less gone as we see it.
Might be that our implementation is a corner case but that's the problem for us.

//Gustav

From: Waris Sagheer (waris) [mailto:waris at cisco.com]
Sent: den 4 juni 2015 04:58
To: Gustav Ulander; Gert Doering; Nick Cutting
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 - ISR4431

Gustav,
Have you looked at smart licensing? I am hoping that should simplify the process.

Best Regards,

[http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg]


Waris Sagheer
Technical Marketing Manager
Service Provider Routing Segment
waris at cisco.com<mailto:waris at cisco.com>
Phone: +1 408 853 6682
Mobile: +1 408 835 1389

CCIE - 19901



This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message.

For corporate legal information go to:http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html



From: Gustav Ulander <gustav.ulander at telecomputing.se<mailto:gustav.ulander at telecomputing.se>>
Date: Wednesday, June 3, 2015 at 5:18 AM
To: Gert Doering <gert at greenie.muc.de<mailto:gert at greenie.muc.de>>, Nick Cutting <ncutting at edgetg.co.uk<mailto:ncutting at edgetg.co.uk>>
Cc: "cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>" <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>>
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 - ISR4431

Hello all.
My take is that a consumption based sales model can be good as long as you are not hindered in your work because of it.
Hate when you have some late night work to be done that can't be completed because of some weird restriction dependent in some way on a license.
RTU licenses are the way from my way of looking at it however, I have a feeling that cisco is not equally impressed with RTU licenses.

//Gustav

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Gert Doering
Sent: den 3 juni 2015 13:55
To: Nick Cutting
Cc: Gert Doering; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 - ISR4431

Hi,

On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 11:41:41AM +0000, Nick Cutting wrote:
Yep, I don't mind at all.  :)
Too many times it has been, "should've gone cisco" in terms of missing features stability etc.
At least with cisco I know what works and doesn't.

I used to say that, 15 years ago...

Then they decided to split the company into in-fighting BUs...

Nowadays, I know that "it works" if I've laid my hands on it and it actually did (and didn't lose the license to make it work on the next upgrade).

gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de<mailto:gert at greenie.muc.de>
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de<mailto:gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de>
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/