[c-nsp] ME3600X IPv6 ND Control & Data Plane Problems

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 02:17:06PM +0200, Dumitru Ciobarcianu wrote:
> On 01-Mar-15 13:47 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
> > This should be perfectly fine for ND.  ND is done using fe80:: addresses,
> > which are *not* matched by "deny any fe00::/9" (fe80 is in the other half
> > of that /8).  So fall through to the "permit any any" line.
> 
> IPv6 address resolution is done with multicast, so FF00::
> I am wrong ?

You're right.  Our e-mails overlapped.  And, I need more coffee.

gert
-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 291 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20150301/517977b8/attachment.sig>