[c-nsp] REP and Spanning-Tree

[Edward Salonia]

See the last two pages of this white paper: http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/products/collateral/switches/me-3400-series-ethernet-access-switches/prod_white_paper0900aecd806ec6fa.pdf

- Ed



On Mar 3, 2015, at 09:39, M K <gunner_200 at live.com> wrote:

I have the below topology 
SW1 -- SW2 -- SW3SW1 and SW2 already ar part from a ring that is running REP (i.e. no spanning -tree on the link between SW1 and SW2)No , I got a new switch (SW4) and connect it to SW1 and SW3 (which means I have now closed circuit)My questions is , would that be an issue? 
SW4 -STP- SW1 - REP - SW2 -STP - SW3 - STP - SW4
Thanks                         
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/