[c-nsp] BGP Max-Prefix - Notification Data Decode Options ?

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:11:26PM +0200, Mark Tinka wrote:
> On 10/Mar/15 19:24, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> >then, your provider is lying.
> 
> Well, the provider may not be lying about their "max-prefix range", 
> whatever that means. But certainly, the OP wants to start considering 
> other providers.

Indeed.  In that part of the hierarchy, the upstream provider should
filter by prefix list (IRR data) and not just max-pfx "I take everything
as long as it's not too many prefixes (but I won't tell you the limit)".

gert
-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 291 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20150310/6b0ae70e/attachment.sig>