[c-nsp] ASR902 vs ME3800X

[Ulrik Ivers]

Hi,

Yes, agree that the new ASR920 is the one you should be looking at.

http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/asr-920-series-aggregation-services-router/datasheet-c78-733397.html

If you go with the ASR-920-24SZ-IM you can add a 2-port 10G interface card to get 6x10G on the box (oversubscribed, though).

We have just ordered one of these and hopefully they will turn out to be a good choice.

/Ulrik

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mark Tinka
Sent: den 18 mars 2015 08:49
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR902 vs ME3800X



On 18/Mar/15 09:37, CiscoNSP List wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> Looking at both of these boxes to terminate 10Gb Aggs and a bunch of either VRF or VPLS tails...3800X looks to support more VRF's(2000 instances) vs 128 on the ASR902...but we only need a 2 or 3, just a heap of subints/vlan ints in the same vrf, but the 902 looks to be able to give me (With 8x1 Interface module x 4 ) 32 x 1Gb ports and 4 x 10Gb ports...price-wise they look pretty close...am I missing something with the ASR902...as they look like a really nice alternative to the ME3800X.....3800X will only give me 24 x 1Gb ports and 2 x 10Gb ports...so would need more of them to accommodate the number of 10G ports I need.

The upgrade path for the ME3600X/3800X is the ASR920.

I'd consider the ASR920 if you're looking at the long-term. My only disappointment with the ASR920 as of today is that the 4x 10Gbps uplinks do not have 40x or 48x customer-facing ports.

Mark.
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/