[c-nsp] IP SLA?

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 12:53:36PM +0000, Scott Granados wrote:
> +1 for using a routing protocol.  BGP with a private AS is a decent fit here.

The main reason we like EIGRP here is "less config, and faster failover",
as compared to BGP :-)  (BGP+BFD wins, of course, but I've yet to see a
customer router/gateway device that is able to do that)

gert
-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 291 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20150324/d54eccd6/attachment.sig>