[c-nsp] AToM

Mohammad Khalil eng_mssk at hotmail.com
Wed Mar 25 04:38:22 EDT 2015


ooh , so I have to create sub interface in order to make the setup ?

> Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 10:24:50 +0200
> From: mihaigabriel at gmail.com
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] AToM
> 
> AFAIk, you cannot create AToM using SVI's in 7600 (we are using lan cards)
> 
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Mohammad Khalil <eng_mssk at hotmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > The issue is that the customer is connected to a switch connected to the
> > 7613 and i Have a trunk to transport all Vlans for other customers with
> > different services
> >
> > > Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 11:02:52 +0200
> > > From: mihaigabriel at gmail.com
> > > To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] AToM
> >
> > >
> > > Use a subinterfate (MUX-UNI) on 7600 instead of VLAN.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Mohammad Khalil <eng_mssk at hotmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all
> > > > I am trying to establish AToM between 7613 and 3600
> > > > The module from the 7613 side is 7600 ES+ 20xGE SFP
> > > >
> > > > 3600#sh run int vlan 183
> > > > interface Vlan183
> > > > no ip address
> > > > xconnect 172.20.40.7 7232183 encapsulation mpls
> > > >
> > > > 7613#sh run int vlan 183
> > > > interface Vlan183
> > > > no ip address
> > > > load-interval 30
> > > > xconnect 172.20.40.232 7232183 encapsulation mpls
> > > >
> > > > 7613#sh mpls l2transport vc 7232183
> > > >
> > > > Local intf Local circuit Dest address VC ID Status
> > > > ------------- -------------------------- --------------- ----------
> > > > ----------
> > > > Vl183 Eth VLAN 183 172.20.40.232 7232183 UP
> > > >
> > > > 3600#sh mpls l2transport vc 7232183
> > > >
> > > > Local intf Local circuit Dest address VC ID Status
> > > > ------------- -------------------------- --------------- ----------
> > > > ----------
> > > > Vl183 Eth VLAN 183 172.20.40.7 7232183 DOWN
> > > >
> > > > I have tried to configure L3VPN (VRF on both routers and test loopback
> > > > interfaces) and it worked fine
> > > >
> > > > Any ideas?
> > > >
> > > > BR,
> > > > Mohammad
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
 		 	   		  


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list