[c-nsp] IP SLA?

Dan Brisson dbrisson at gmail.com
Sat Mar 28 22:35:33 EDT 2015


Hello,

On 3/24/15 8:48 AM, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 08:27:59AM -0400, Dan Brisson wrote:
>> I'm curious what folks do in the situation where you have redundant
>> links to your customers.  I'm speaking primarily in co-lo environments
>> where you offer redundant Internet connectivity to co-lo customers.  So
>> for example, you give a customer 2 ethernet handoffs from two separate
>> Layer 2 switches.   Now what do you do if the customer wants to go to a
>> routed model using both links.  I could allocate /30s for both links,
>> but then I have the issue of how to reliably route their block to them
>> w/out running a routing protocol that will detect if one of the links
>> goes down.  That's where I came to static routes with IP SLA but I
>> wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something easier.
> Just run a routing protocol... *SO* much easier.
>
> We use EIGRP for that (different EIGRP process, distribute-lists in and out,
> so the customer can only announce his networks and will only receive default
> from us), but for customers that cannot do that, we've also used BGP in
> the past - more universally available, but way slower in falling over unless
> used with BFD.
>
> You could use static+BFD, but I bet that half of the available gear will
> not support that...
>
> gert
Thanks for the reply.  Sounds like other than statics with BFD, which I 
doubt will be an option due to customer's hardware, I should just run a 
routing protocol.  Could I ask how you get eigrp to only advertise a 
default to the customer?  I get filtering with distribute lists, but in 
my scenario my router is only currently running BGP and receives a full 
table from my upstream.  For eigrp to advertise the default, looks like 
a need a static 0.0.0.0 route. Am I missing something?  It seems like 
doing that when I have a full table is a bad idea, but maybe it's not a 
big deal?

Thanks!
-dan


>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list