[c-nsp] IP SLA?

Mark Tinka mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Sun Mar 29 00:46:40 EDT 2015



On 29/Mar/15 05:12, Dan Brisson wrote:
>
> Labbing this up, OSPF makes the default route advertisement much easier:
>
> router ospf 160
>  network 192.168.10.1 0.0.0.3 area 0
>  default-information originate always
>
> Downsides of OSPF vs. EIGRP in this scenario?

I just think it's a terrible idea running an IGP with a customer.

I mean, I see the benefit from a link failure detection point of view, 
but an IGP is still an IGP - and that "I" stands for Interior.

Do you know what hardware/software the customer is running?

Mark.


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list