[c-nsp] IP SLA?
Mark Tinka
mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Sun Mar 29 00:46:40 EDT 2015
On 29/Mar/15 05:12, Dan Brisson wrote:
>
> Labbing this up, OSPF makes the default route advertisement much easier:
>
> router ospf 160
> network 192.168.10.1 0.0.0.3 area 0
> default-information originate always
>
> Downsides of OSPF vs. EIGRP in this scenario?
I just think it's a terrible idea running an IGP with a customer.
I mean, I see the benefit from a link failure detection point of view,
but an IGP is still an IGP - and that "I" stands for Interior.
Do you know what hardware/software the customer is running?
Mark.
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list