[c-nsp] IP SLA?

Mark Tinka mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Sun Mar 29 16:49:11 EDT 2015


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



On 29/Mar/15 22:45, Gert Doering wrote:
>
> On the other hand, while you are still all picking on me for suggesting
> an IGP - don't forget the havoc that you can do with BGP, like, "not
> having proper incoming filters" and "not ensuring that prefixes you
> do not want to send to other parties do not leak", and such :-)
> (insert shameless plug for RFC 7454 here...)
>
> So whatever protocol you use (besides static+bfd), you MUST ensure that
> a) you only accept what the customer is permitted to announce (typos and
> other accidents happen), and b) you clearly understand how far you want
> that information to propagate, and ensure that it happens that way.

Agreed.

Mark.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=8PIY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list