[c-nsp] Nexus 9300

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 09:31:39AM +0000, Gustav Ulander wrote:
> We are really happy with them L2 wise. 
> Routing features are abit immature we feel. 

So, for someone who doesn't understand Nexus nomenclature or architecture 
- where is the "underlying" difference between N3064, N3548 and N9372? 
They all seem to be "48x 10G + <x>"...

What's the significance of "Nexus 3xxxx" vs. "9xxx" in this context anyway,
except "marketing gone rampant"?  I thought 9xxx are the big SDN-ish boxes,
not 1RU L2 stuff...

gert
-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 291 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20150526/91726339/attachment.sig>