[c-nsp] OSPF per-prefix LFA

George Giannousopoulos ggiannou at gmail.com
Thu May 28 08:19:38 EDT 2015


Actually I was referring to the following timers

timers throttle spf X X X
timers throttle lsa X X X
timers lsa arrival X
timers pacing flood X


On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Mohammad Khalil <eng_mssk at hotmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi
>
> Now , the main link is active again with hello/dead intervals adjsuted
>
> CSR#sh ip ospf interface gigabitEthernet 1 | inc Dead
>   Timer intervals configured, Hello 1, Dead 4, Wait 4, Retransmit 5
>
> R2#sh ip ospf int f0/0 | inc Dead
>   Timer intervals configured, Hello 1, Dead 4, Wait 4, Retransmit 5
>
> CSR#sh ip route 2.2.2.2
> Routing entry for 2.2.2.2/32
>   Known via "ospf 1", distance 110, metric 2, type intra area
>   Last update from 192.168.12.2 on GigabitEthernet1, 00:01:33 ago
>   Routing Descriptor Blocks:
>   * 192.168.12.2, from 2.2.2.2, 00:01:33 ago, via GigabitEthernet1
>       Route metric is 2, traffic share count is 1
>       Repair Path: 192.168.13.3, via GigabitEthernet2
>
> CSR#sh ip cef 2.2.2.2
> 2.2.2.2/32
>   nexthop 192.168.12.2 GigabitEthernet1
>     repair: attached-nexthop 192.168.13.3 GigabitEthernet2
>
> CSR#sh ip route repair-paths 2.2.2.2
> Routing entry for 2.2.2.2/32
>   Known via "ospf 1", distance 110, metric 2, type intra area
>   Last update from 192.168.12.2 on GigabitEthernet1, 00:02:08 ago
>   Routing Descriptor Blocks:
>   * 192.168.12.2, from 2.2.2.2, 00:02:08 ago, via GigabitEthernet1
>       Route metric is 2, traffic share count is 1
>       Repair Path: 192.168.13.3, via GigabitEthernet2
>     [RPR]192.168.13.3, from 2.2.2.2, 00:02:08 ago, via GigabitEthernet2
>       Route metric is 3, traffic share count is 1
>
> The outputs as I understood the feature is fine and backup route is in
> place , but I was asking about the time it should take the backup path to
> be installed in the RIB?
>
> Thanks again
>
> BR,
> Mohammad
>
> > Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 13:02:08 +0100
> > From: dan at illusionnetworks.com
> > To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] OSPF per-prefix LFA
> >
> > On 28 May 2015 at 12:24, Mohammad Khalil <eng_mssk at hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all
> > > I am trying to test the feature
> > > My topology consists of three routers (one of them is CSR1000v) and the
> > > other two are 3725 all simulated via GNS3
> > >
> > > R1(CSR) is connected to R2 and R3 , there is a direct connection as
> well
> > > between R2 and R3
> > > All routers are configured with a loopback interface with the form of
> > > x.x.x.x/32 where x is the router number
> > >
> > > Now , R1 is learning R2 loopback interface normally and logically
> through
> > > the direct link with R2
> > >
> > > When I shutdown the interface with R2 (as I do not want to turn off the
> > > remote interface on R2 as I cannot turn on BFD on GNS3) and I have
> checked
> > > the route to 2.2.2.2 , it took about 5-6 seconds to install the same
> route
> > > via the backup path (via R3)
> > >
> > > Now , I have configured the feature on the CSR
> > > CSR(config)#router ospf 1
> > > CSR(config-router)#fast-reroute per-prefix enable area 0
> prefix-priority
> > > high
> > >
> > > And I repeat the same test it took about 4 seconds to learn the prefix
> via
> > > the backup path
> > >
> > > Is this the expected behavior or it should be less than that?
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance
> > >
> > > BR,
> > > Mohammad
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Hi Mohammed,
> >
> > What's the output of 'show ip repair-paths' and 'show ip cef 2.2.2.2' on
> R1
> > when the link between R1 and R2 is up? You should see an RPR route for R2
> > loopback via R3.
> >
> > If you don't see any RPR route, you may also need to force
> prefix-priority
> > of loopbacks to high with something like:
> >
> > ip prefix-list LOOPBACK-PREFIXES seq 5 permit 2.2.2.2/32
> > !
> > route-map OSPF-SPF-PRIORITY permit 10
> >  match ip address prefix-list LOOPBACK-PREFIXES
> > !
> > router ospf 1
> >  prefix-priority high route-map OSPF-SPF-PRIORITY
> > !
> >
> > I've had to do this on IOS before - not sure about XE.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Dan
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list