[c-nsp] Spanning Tree works great - except when it doesn't
Chris Hunt
dharmachris at gmail.com
Thu Oct 15 10:27:00 EDT 2015
Nice one Nick. A three pointer from WAY outside the box..
-Chris
On 10/15/2015 4:56 AM, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
> Hi, Nick,
>
>> Am 15.10.2015 um 13:43 schrieb Nick Cutting <ncutting at edgetg.co.uk>:
>> I came across a curly one like this a few months back - turned out the STP handling of native VLan frames VS a non-created but configured native vlan on the downstream switch port.
>> The downstream switchport was also configured for native vlan of 999 - BUT vlan999 was not created in the vlan database so defaulted to expecting STP frames untagged I think - it was something like that.
> You nailed it! for some reason that I now need to investigate
> I do not have VLAN 999 in my VLAN database.
>
> *argh*
>
> Thanks, everyone.
> Patrick
> --
> punkt.de GmbH * Kaiserallee 13a * 76133 Karlsruhe
> Tel. 0721 9109 0 * Fax 0721 9109 100
> info at punkt.de http://www.punkt.de
> Gf: Jürgen Egeling AG Mannheim 108285
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list