[c-nsp] Xconnect Precednce
Mohammad Khalil
eng_mssk at hotmail.com
Mon Sep 21 03:55:58 EDT 2015
Thanks Arie
Would configuring the below commands under the interface level do the trick ?
mls qos
trust cos
mls qos
trust dscp
BR,
Mohammad
From: ariev at vayner.net
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 17:31:47 +0000
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Xconnect Precednce
To: eng_mssk at hotmail.com; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
By default the 7600 and 6500 (assuming mls qos is enabled) would not trust incoming marked traffic, and classify it as BE. On egress they would overwrite the DHCP value according to the ingress classification.
So you need to look into the specific qos implementation of 6500/7600, which is not trivial.
The other thing you need to look into are the qos models for MPLS (uniform and pipe) and how they apply on the 7600.
Tnx, Arie
On Sun, Sep 20, 2015, 08:23 Mohammad Khalil <eng_mssk at hotmail.com> wrote:
Hi arie , thanks for the reply
My CE is 6509
access-list 105 permit ip any any precedence routine log
access-list 105 permit ip any any precedence priority log
access-list 105 permit ip any any precedence immediate log
access-list 105 permit ip any any precedence flash log
access-list 105 permit ip any any precedence flash-override
log
access-list 105 permit ip any any precedence critical log
access-list 105 permit ip any any precedence internet log
access-list 105 permit ip any any precedence network log
access-list 105 permit ip any any
interface GigabitEthernet0/1.56
encapsulation dot1Q 56
ip address 10.3.3.1 255.255.255.0
ip access-group 105 in
ip access-group 105 out
My PE configuration
interface vlan 56xconnect x.x.x.x 56 encapsulation mpls
Thanks
BR,Mohammad
From: ariev at vayner.net
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 14:58:28 +0000
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Xconnect Precednce
To: eng_mssk at hotmail.com; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Mohammed,
Can you please provide the complete interface configuration? Is this the PE or the CE? Which platform is it?
Generally speaking, layer 2 pseudowires should use layer 2 COS for traffic classification.
Tnx, Arie
On Sat, Sep 19, 2015, 03:21 Mohammad Khalil <eng_mssk at hotmail.com> wrote:
Hi all
I am trying to test different tos values between CEs
What am trying to test is default traffic which will fall into the routine traffic and another flow which should fall in the critical traffic (tos=160)
My access-list looks as below
access-list 105 permit ip any any precedence routine log
access-list 105 permit ip any any precedence priority log
access-list 105 permit ip any any precedence immediate log
access-list 105 permit ip any any precedence flash log
access-list 105 permit ip any any precedence flash-override
log
access-list 105 permit ip any any precedence critical log
access-list 105 permit ip any any precedence internet log
access-list 105 permit ip any any precedence network log
access-list 105 permit ip any any
interface GigabitEthernet0/1.56ip access-group 105 in
ip access-group 105 out
ping 10.3.3.1 repeat 19 tos 160
ping 10.3.3.1 repeat 15
Probe#sh ip access-lists
105
Extended IP access list 105
10 permit ip any any precedence routine log (34 matches)
20 permit ip any any precedence priority
log
30 permit ip any any precedence immediate
log
40 permit ip any any precedence flash log
50 permit ip any any precedence
flash-override log
60 permit ip any any precedence critical log
70 permit ip any any precedence internet
log
80 permit ip any any precedence network
log
90 permit ip any any
The 19 ICMP packets should fall into the critical
I have tested this on GNS3 and it worked fine !
Is there something global should be enabled on the PE which is 7606?
BR,Mohammad
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list