[c-nsp] L2VPN between ASR920 and Juniper

Tue Sep 22 15:12:22 EDT 2015

What do you mean?
You mean We cannot use EoMPLS over GRE on ASR920?
So why Cisco 7200VXR or Cisco 2800 can support this feature while they are
older and weaker routers?
Also if we cannot use EoMPLS over GRE on ASR920 then which model do you
recommend? ASR 1001? ASR1002?

Thank you for your help...

On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Vinod Kumar Balasubramanyam (vinbalas) <
vinbalas at cisco.com> wrote:

> This is because GRE is not supported on ASR 920. We doing basic
> implementation in software but there is no hardware support for GRE.
>
> *Vinod Kumar Balasubramanyam*
> ENGINEER.TECHNICAL MARKETING
>
> vinbalas at cisco.com
> WebEx Social profile <http://iwe.cisco.com/web/vinbalas>
> Phone: *+1 408 527 2051*
> Mobile: *+1 919 802 8751*
>
> CCIE - 25703
>
>
> www.cisco.com
>
>  Think before you print.
>
> This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole
> use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
> authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by
> reply email and delete all copies of this message.
>
> Please click here
> <http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html> for
> Company Registration Information.
>
>
> From: Alireza Soltanian <soltanian at gmail.com>
> Date: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 at 11:37 AM
> To: Vinod Kumar Balasubramanyam <vinbalas at cisco.com>
> Cc: "cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net" <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>, Adam
> Vitkovsky <Adam.Vitkovsky at gamma.co.uk>
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] L2VPN between ASR920 and Juniper
>
> I will check this. Another thing which I should mention is I tested the
> case when both sides uses same vlan—id. (On juniper side inner vlan id is
> same as 920 side). When both sides use same vlan id, L2VPN is established.
> I must mention between 920 and m320 I have gre tunnel with static
> routing.When L2VPN is established over GRE no trafic is passed over l2vpn.
> I did some deep inspection on this:
> Suppose Traffic(Consider normal PING) is sent from CE of m320 to CE of 920:
> At start ARP request of CE of m320 is sent to CE of 920. The traffic is
> recieved by M320 at is sent over L2VPN over GRE to 920. This router sends
> ARP to its CE. This CE gets it and tries to send the ARP reply. BUT At 920
> no traffic is sent over L2vpn toward m320.
> I checked this scenario while both PEs are 920. When we have GRE in the
> middle, no traffic is passed over L2VPN but when GRE is removed, every
> thing works fine.
> Any idea about this issue?
>
> THANK YOU
> Alireza....
> On 22 Sep 2015 21:36, "Vinod Kumar Balasubramanyam (vinbalas)" <
> vinbalas at cisco.com> wrote:
>
>> I ran into the same thing below. 920 by default negotiates vc type 5.
>> Please configure vc type 5 on Juniper and check if the l2vpn establishes.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Vinod Kumar Balasubramanyam
>> ENGINEER.TECHNICAL MARKETING
>>
>> vinbalas at cisco.com
>> WebEx Social profile <http://iwe.cisco.com/web/vinbalas>
>> Phone: +1 408 527 2051
>> Mobile: +1 919 802 8751
>>
>> CCIE - 25703
>>
>> www.cisco.com <http://www.cisco.com/>
>>
>>  Think before you print.
>> This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole
>> use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
>> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
>> (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by
>> reply email and delete all copies of this message.
>> Please click here
>> <http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html> for
>> Company Registration Information.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 9/22/15, 10:09 AM, "cisco-nsp on behalf of Adam Vitkovsky"
>> <cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net on behalf of
>> Adam.Vitkovsky at gamma.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>> >Hi Alireza,
>> >
>> >This is what I have found :
>> >Interoperability between Cisco and Juniper in L2vpn with vc type 4,
>> >CSCuq28998
>> >
>> >Symptom:
>> >All VC went down after the IOS upgrade on the router (with the last
>> >error: Imposition VLAN rewrite capability mismatch with peer)
>> >
>> >o Old image: 12.2(33)SRD3
>> >o New Image: 15.2(4)S4a
>> >
>> >Conditions:
>> >VC type 4 negotiation
>> >
>> >Workaround:
>> >- configure VC type 5 between the routers (configured on Juniper side)
>> >- configuring or using no-control-word command on Juniper router
>> >
>> >
>> >Last Modified:
>> >Aug 26,2014
>> >
>> >Status:
>> >Terminated
>> >
>> >Severity:
>> >2 Severe
>> >
>> >Product:
>> >Cisco 7600 Series Routers
>> >
>> >
>> >adam
>> >>
>> >
>> >        Adam Vitkovsky
>> >        IP Engineer
>> >
>> >T:      0333 006 5936
>> >E:      Adam.Vitkovsky at gamma.co.uk
>> >W:      www.gamma.co.uk
>> >
>> >This is an email from Gamma Telecom Ltd, trading as ³Gamma². The contents
>> >of this email are confidential to the ordinary user of the email address
>> >to which it was addressed. This email is not intended to create any legal
>> >relationship. No one else may place any reliance upon it, or copy or
>> >forward all or any of it in any form (unless otherwise notified). If you
>> >receive this email in error, please accept our apologies, we would be
>> >obliged if you would telephone our postmaster on +44 (0) 808 178 9652 or
>> >email postmaster at gamma.co.uk
>> >
>> >Gamma Telecom Limited, a company incorporated in England and Wales, with
>> >limited liability, with registered number 04340834, and whose registered
>> >office is at 5 Fleet Place London EC4M 7RD and whose principal place of
>> >business is at Kings House, Kings Road West, Newbury, Berkshire, RG14
>> 5BY.
>> >
>> >
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >> From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf
>> Of
>> >> Alireza Soltanian
>> >> Sent: 21 September 2015 13:20
>> >> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> >> Subject: [c-nsp] L2VPN between ASR920 and Juniper
>> >>
>> >> Hi Everybody
>> >>
>> >> When I try to establish L2VPN connection between ASR920 and Juniper
>> >> M320, I have this output on ASR920:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ASR920#show mpls l2transport vc detail
>> >>
>> >> Local interface: Gi0/0/4 up, line protocol up, Eth VLAN 810 up
>> >>
>> >>   Destination address: 10.234.233.29, VC ID: 2631, VC status: down
>> >>
>> >>     Last error: Imposition VLAN rewrite capability mismatch with peer
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I am using different VLANs on both side:
>> >>
>> >> ASR920: VLAN 810
>> >>
>> >> Juniper M320: VLAN 2631
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> This is configuration on ASR side:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> interface GigabitEthernet0/0/4
>> >>
>> >> no ip address
>> >>
>> >> media-type auto-select
>> >>
>> >> negotiation auto
>> >>
>> >> service instance 1 ethernet
>> >>
>> >>   encapsulation dot1q 810
>> >>
>> >>   rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
>> >>
>> >>   xconnect 10.234.233.29 2631 encapsulation mpls
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> this is configuration on Juniper M320
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> set interfaces xe-1/0/0 unit 2631 encapsulation vlan-ccc
>> >>
>> >> set interfaces xe-1/0/0 unit 2631 vlan-tags outer 3012
>> >>
>> >> set interfaces xe-1/0/0 unit 2631 vlan-tags inner 2631
>> >>
>> >> set interfaces xe-1/0/0 unit 2631 input-vlan-map pop
>> >>
>> >> set interfaces xe-1/0/0 unit 2631 output-vlan-map push
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> set protocols l2circuit neighbor 10.241.252.91 interface xe-1/0/0.2631
>> >>virtual-
>> >> circuit-id 2631
>> >>
>> >> set protocols l2circuit neighbor 10.241.252.91 interface xe-1/0/0.2631
>> >>no-
>> >> control-word
>> >>
>> >> set protocols l2circuit neighbor 10.241.252.91 interface xe-1/0/0.2631
>> >>mtu
>> >> 1500
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Do you have any idea what is the issue?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>> >
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> >https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> >archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
>>