[c-nsp] LDP sessions established to non directly connected routers, when new link is activated

[Adam Vitkovsky]

Hi,

Have you checked both ends if either end has a tLDP session configured it would come up.
Also xconnects are using targeted LDP sessions, isn't there some forgotten xconnect pointing to these routers somewhere?
But then the question is why the session wouldn't be formed over the existing path.

With regards to BGP failing are the sessions then re-established or they remain down please?
I suspect it could be an MTU problem that is some of the links on the new path ASR2(POPA) to ASR1(POPD) to ASR1(POPC) -have lower MTU than the links on the existing path via POPB.


adam
>

        Adam Vitkovsky
        IP Engineer

T:      0333 006 5936
E:      Adam.Vitkovsky at gamma.co.uk
W:      www.gamma.co.uk

This is an email from Gamma Telecom Ltd, trading as “Gamma”. The contents of this email are confidential to the ordinary user of the email address to which it was addressed. This email is not intended to create any legal relationship. No one else may place any reliance upon it, or copy or forward all or any of it in any form (unless otherwise notified). If you receive this email in error, please accept our apologies, we would be obliged if you would telephone our postmaster on +44 (0) 808 178 9652 or email postmaster at gamma.co.uk

Gamma Telecom Limited, a company incorporated in England and Wales, with limited liability, with registered number 04340834, and whose registered office is at 5 Fleet Place London EC4M 7RD and whose principal place of business is at Kings House, Kings Road West, Newbury, Berkshire, RG14 5BY.


-----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> CiscoNSP List
> Sent: 22 September 2015 23:59
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [c-nsp] LDP sessions established to non directly connected routers,
> when new link is activated
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
>
>
> Bit of a strange one.
>
>
>
> 2 x ASR1001's (ASR1 and ASR2) directly connected (POPA), with OSPF, MPLS
> and BGP established
>
>
>
> ASR1 connects to POPB (ME36001), also with OSPF, MPLS and BGP
> established
>
>
>
> ME36001 connects to ME36002 at POPB, also with OSPF, MPLS and BGP
> established
>
>
>
> ME36002 connects to an ASR1006 at POPC, also with OSPF, MPLS and BGP
> established
>
>
>
> We have a new link connecting to ASR2(POPA) that goes to POPD, also with
> OSPF, MPLS and BGP established - but OSPF cost set high so that it is not
> used...due to a strange outage it causes when OSPF is set to no cost.
>
>
>
> As soon as the new link on ASR2(POPA) and ASR1006(POPD) OSPF is set to no
> cost, ASR2(POPA) for some reason establishes LDP to ME36002(POPC) - but it
> has no direct connection to this device, nor is targetted LDP enabled to this
> device, and ASR1(POPA) establishes LDP to ASR1006(POPC) - but it also has
> no direct connection to this device, nor is targetted LDP enabled to this
> device....result of these LDP sessions establishing is ASR1(POPA) losing BGP
> neighbourships to three other routers that are connected via the
> ASR1006(POPC).
>
>
>
> Ive opened a TAC case, but if anyone can explain how/why the LDP sessions
> would establish when this new link is "activated" it would be greatly
> appreciated!
>
>
>
> Cheers.
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/