[c-nsp] ISR4451 or ASR920

[Mark Tinka]

On 31/Mar/16 08:29, Gert Doering wrote:

> Pricing for the ASR920 is complicated due to hardware/software licenses
> and models, but base list price of the ISR4451 is about 3x the base list 
> price of ASR920-12CZ.  So if ASR920 works for the requirements, it seems
> to be "the!" platform of choice.

It is actually not that complicated. There are just lots of options.

>
> (Still waiting for someone to explain to me how control-plane protection
> works on ASR920... is it 6500-style CoPP, ASR9k-style LPTS, or "we have
> a fast CPU, we don't need this stuff!"-denial?)

Closer to the ASR1000, but much more limited in current code.

Mark.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20160402/b0bb151e/attachment.sig>