[c-nsp] IPv6 routing vs IPv4 Nating

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:07:44PM +0100, Tom Hill wrote:
>  *secretly very happy that IPv6 is teaching ops how to do networking
> without any NAT* ;)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v26BAlfWBm8

(but in this particular case, the issue is not so much "NAT" as 
"there are stateful firewalls in the way, that require symmetric
traffic return from the Internet" - which makes this much harder
than "just plain routing")

gert

-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 273 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20160822/4a1cb7c9/attachment.sig>