[c-nsp] NCS-5001 - sweet...got one in the lab

Gert Doering gert at greenie.muc.de
Tue Feb 2 11:04:28 EST 2016


On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 03:53:25PM +0000, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> Gert Doering wrote:
> > And yes, I'm fully aware that using EIGRP has lots of drawbacks, like,
> > "vendor lock in"
> you mean "BU lock-in"?  Vendor lock-in is old and busted.

Is there a list of Cisco BUs and which product is messed up by whom?

I would have expected that most of the "it is fast and has XR" stuff 
comes from the same BU (since every BU has to have their own OS anyway[*]), 
but seemingly that was naive.

[*] now, one could argue that XR 6 qualifies for the "12.2SX vs. 12.2SR
bullshit award 2016"...  so it might well be a different BU, with different
features, and more inter-BU bullshit.

[**] BU-llshit???


USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 291 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20160202/2e9ffdfb/attachment.sig>

More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list