[c-nsp] ASR1001 vs 1001-X PPP

[Nick Cutting]

The last 1001X I bought, I accidently ordered the 1001 - when I changed my order, I think the price was the same or almost minimal difference. Cisco doesn't want people buying the old kit either.

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Feedly Reader
Sent: 02 February 2016 22:38
To: Nicolas KARP; Ian Goodall
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR1001 vs 1001-X PPP

Hi Ian,

Based on my understanding, the CPU on 1001-X is more powerful and can handle more concurrent session establishments. It also has 2 10G interfaces which can come in handy. However, the queue-count is considerably lower in the 1001s which makes QoS difficult, depending on your policies. I would recommend a 1002-X if you are looking at ASR 1K. 	

Have a look at this document here for more details:

http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/asr-1000-series-aggregation-services-routers/datasheet-c78-731640.html

Vaibhav

________________________________________
From: cisco-nsp <cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net> on behalf of Nicolas KARP <liste at karp.fr>
Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2016 10:27 PM
To: Ian Goodall
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR1001 vs 1001-X PPP

Hello Ian,

ASR 1001 is going to be EOS on April  :
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/asr-1000-series-aggregation-services-routers/eos-eol-notice-c51-734572.html

Replacement : 1001-X


And it's the same price...


# - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
# - -   Nicolas KARP
# - -   Network and Security Engineer
# - -    Email : liste at karp.fr <nicolas at karp.fr>
# - -    Linkedin :  http://www.linkedin.com/in/nicolaskarp
# - -    Viadeo : http://www.viadeo.com/fr/profile/nicolas.karp
<http://www.viadeo.com/fr/profile/nicolas.karp%20>
# - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -



2016-02-02 19:48 GMT+01:00 Ian Goodall <bbaa4570 at gmail.com>:

> We have a number of older 7206 routers used in a LNS role (PPP/L2TP).
>
> As part of a network refresh we are looking to move towards the 
> ASR1001 or 1001-X. The datasheet shows both support up to 5Gbps 
> throughput and 8k subs.
>
> Is anyone able to confirm if 8k subs on a ASR1001 realistic in the 
> real world, or should we be looking at the higher CPU on the X version?
>
> Also on the throughput restriction is this in+out on all ports combined?
> For example we have L2TP/PPP on one interface and upstream traffic on 
> another port. If we have 1Mbps of traffic coming in and then route out 
> on the L2TP/PPP interface is this counted as 1Mbps or 2Mbps?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Ian
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net 
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/