[c-nsp] Anyone used the C6800-32P10G-XL cards yet?

[Nick Cutting]

I've got 2 of the 16 port ones (similarly oversubscribed)
- But I need to be on super latest SUP2T version to get the module recognized. Will be upgrading IOS this week, Ill let you know how they go

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Hunter Fuller
Sent: 19 February 2016 19:16
To: Peter Kranz
Cc: cisco-nsp
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Anyone used the C6800-32P10G-XL cards yet?

We are currently using the WS-X6904-40G card which is 2:1 oversubscribed. We use many of ours with FourX adapters, which let you put four 10Gbase interfaces on a 40Gbase CFP slot.

I am totally stoked about the 32 port 10Gbase card because it will be similarly oversubscribed but with double the port density.

I'd also love to hear any reason I might be about to shoot myself in the foot. ;)

--
Hunter Fuller
Network Engineer
VBRH Annex B-1
+1 256 824 5331

Office of Information Technology
The University of Alabama in Huntsville
Systems and Infrastructure


On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Peter Kranz <pkranz at unwiredltd.com> wrote:
> Anyone used the C6800-32P10G-XL cards yet? Seems like a no brainer 
> replacement for the WS-X6908-10G card at almost the identical price 
> point, but double the fabric bandwidth (160G vs 80G) if you upgrade to 
> a 6807-XL chassis.
>
> Peter Kranz
> www.UnwiredLtd.com <http://www.unwiredltd.com/>
> Desk: 510-868-1614 x100
> Mobile: 510-207-0000
> pkranz at unwiredltd.com <mailto:pkranz at unwiredltd.com>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net 
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/