[c-nsp] loop guard still useful?

Marian Ďurkovič md at bts.sk
Tue Jan 19 11:37:46 EST 2016

On Tue, 19 Jan 2016 16:26:04 +0100, Lukas Tribus wrote
> What we are doing here is handle predicable hardware and link
> failures with software features like UDLD and fix stupid
> assumptions in STP by using loop-guard.

Well, the proper fix here would be to completely avoid STP and use more 
recent/decent protocol like TRILL...


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list