[c-nsp] SUP720's memory, looking at options..

[Mack McBride]

The spec sheet isn't really clear.
On the 2T it is 1M which is quite constraining.
If it is actually 2M then it would be fine as eventually IPv4 will die and IPv6 is going to have less prefixes.


Mack McBride | Senior Network Architect | ViaWest, Inc.
O: 720.891.2502 | C: 303.720.2711 | mack.mcbride at viawest.com | www.viawest.com


-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Kranz [mailto:pkranz at unwiredltd.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2016 2:27 PM
To: Mack McBride; 'Gert Doering'
Cc: 'cisco-nsp'; 'Jon Lewis'
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] SUP720's memory, looking at options..

Regarding TCAM ... Data sheets are a little confusing in this regard, some parts indicate "2M FIB TCAM Entries" some imply a 1M FIB limit. If it is a 2M FIB limit, It seems unlikely you would exhaust that limit in the next 10 years.

Peter Kranz
www.UnwiredLtd.com
Desk: 510-868-1614 x100
Mobile: 510-207-0000
pkranz at unwiredltd.com

This message contains information that may be confidential, privileged or otherwise protected by law from disclosure. It is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Unless you are the addressee or authorized agent of the addressee, you may not review, copy, distribute or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained within. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender by electronic reply and immediately delete all copies of the message.