[c-nsp] SUP720's memory, looking at options..

[Mack McBride]

4 million routes dynamically allocated.



Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: Howard Leadmon <howard at leadmon.net>
Date: 7/6/16 12:54 AM (GMT-07:00)
To: Mack McBride <mack.mcbride at viawest.com>, 'Gert Doering' <gert at greenie.muc.de>, 'Peter Kranz' <pkranz at unwiredltd.com>
Cc: 'Jon Lewis' <jlewis at lewis.org>, 'cisco-nsp' <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] SUP720's memory, looking at options..

Is there any place where they list how many routes the ASR9K will handle,
granted most of the current goodness is too rich for my blood, but stuff
like the RSP4G and RSP8G are pretty easy to come by.   I thought I saw
something saying they were limited to say 512K routes, but I may be thinking
of something else.

 Nice to hear the ASR1K worked well, even with netflow..


---
Howard Leadmon - howard at leadmon.net
PBW Communications, LLC
http://www.pbwcomm.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> Mack McBride
> Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2016 4:16 PM
> To: Gert Doering <gert at greenie.muc.de>; Peter Kranz
> <pkranz at unwiredltd.com>
> Cc: 'Jon Lewis' <jlewis at lewis.org>; 'cisco-nsp'
<cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] SUP720's memory, looking at options..
>
> The Sup6T is still TCAM limited.
> We are moving to ASR9Ks.
> But we have used the ASR1Ks where we need full netflow capture with great
> success.
> The port density and total throughput is not as high as the 6500 though.
>
>
> Mack McBride | Senior Network Architect | ViaWest, Inc.
> O: 720.891.2502 | C: 303.720.2711 | mack.mcbride at viawest.com |
> www.viawest.com<http://www.viawest.com>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> Gert Doering
> Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2016 1:03 PM
> To: Peter Kranz
> Cc: 'cisco-nsp'; 'Jon Lewis'
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] SUP720's memory, looking at options..
>
> hi,
>
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 10:54:47AM -0700, Peter Kranz wrote:
> > There is also the option of jumping to a used SUP2T or a SUP6T in your
> > 6500 chassis. Depending on the line cards you have, you might have to
> > replace some of them.
>
> Has anyone tried 6T yet?  Does it do useful netflow?
>
> 2T had great promises, but vastly underdelivered, so we're halfway ready
to
> just leave the platform completely...
>
> gert
>
> --
> USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
>
//www.muc.de/~gert/
> Gert Doering - Munich, Germany
gert at greenie.muc.de
> fax: +49-89-35655025
gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
> This message contains information that may be confidential, privileged or
> otherwise protected by law from disclosure. It is intended for the
exclusive
> use of the addressee(s). Unless you are the addressee or authorized agent
> of the addressee, you may not review, copy, distribute or disclose to
anyone
> the message or any information contained within. If you have received this
> message in error, please contact the sender by electronic reply and
> immediately delete all copies of the message.
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

This message contains information that may be confidential, privileged or otherwise protected by law from disclosure. It is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Unless you are the addressee or authorized agent of the addressee, you may not review, copy, distribute or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained within. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender by electronic reply and immediately delete all copies of the message.