[c-nsp] SUP720's memory, looking at options..

[Curtis Piehler]

Thanks,

I plan on upgrading to SRE12 as well as repartioning the TCAM for now.
On Jul 6, 2016 8:49 PM, "Howard Leadmon" <howard at leadmon.net> wrote:

Not that I am aware of, as I mentioned earlier, my SUP720-3BXL's are
currently at 92% memory used, and I haven't had any problems at all with
them to date.   Looking at jumping to RSP720's or some platform with more
memory to stop future issues, but have never had problems sshing into the
boxes..


---
Howard Leadmon - howard at leadmon.net
PBW Communications, LLC
http://www.pbwcomm.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> Curtis Piehler
> Sent: Wednesday, July 6, 2016 12:49 PM
> To: Gert Doering <gert at greenie.muc.de>
> Cc: Jon Lewis <jlewis at lewis.org>; cisco-nsp <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] SUP720's memory, looking at options..
>
> So we know about the memory constraint on the 3BXLs but what happens if
> the
> memory usage actually hits 90%?  Will the SUP still allow VTY sessions?
I
> know on the NPEs for the 7200s once 90% is reached the router will
rejecting
> all VTY attempts.