[c-nsp] Classic IOS shared policy instance

[Curtis Piehler]

Ok so that means when if you apply a policy-map ingress or egress to a
physical interface all of the associated sub-interfaces will use the same
policy-map (same token bucket)?  Instead of applying the same policy-map to
different sub-interfaces which uses a different token bucket (IE: 2 100M
policies instead of a 1 100M policy shared across all associated
sub-interfaces).

Thanks

On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Antoine Monnier <
mrantoinemonnier at gmail.com> wrote:

> not sure that s what you are looking for: if you apply the policy-map at
> the physical interface level, it will apply for all traffic in the sub
> interfaces.
>
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Curtis Piehler <cpiehler2 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> In simpler terms I am looking for a shared token bucket configuration
>> across multiple sub-interfaces on the classic IOS platform
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 1:08 AM, Curtis Piehler <cpiehler2 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I have a particular scenario doing some QoS on classic IOS devices.
>> >
>> > I have two WAN sub-interfaces part of a physical interface and a service
>> > policy defined that shapes the "WAN" to 100M.  Is there a way I can make
>> > both sub-interfaces derive from this one policy-map.
>> >
>> > On an ASR9000 I know you can do service-policy out
>> shared-policy-instance
>> > xyz.
>> >
>> > What if you apply the service-policy to the physical interface (has no
>> IP)
>> > ?  Will the two sub-interfaces derive from that?
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > Curtis
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
>
>