[c-nsp] ASR9001 Vs ASR1006

[Mark Tinka]

On 17/May/16 17:32, Lukas Tribus wrote:

> I see your point, however since there is no 64 bit XR kit available today,
> I'm quite confident Cisco won't make us throw away the entire XR/SP
> gear currently supported, that would be huge freakin' mistake.
>
> I don't see a reason why we could not upgrade the existing Intel
> based XR gear (typhoon/tomahawk) from 32bit QNX to 64bit
> Linux, other than increased memory usage.

You might be safe with this strategy on the ASR9000. Not on the CRS.

Mark.