[c-nsp] BGP default vs BGP full

[Satish Patel]

If tomorrow I will have second link from them so two individual fiber terminated on my router in that case how I will make second link redendency or can I do loadbalacing? 

--
Sent from my iPhone

On May 21, 2016, at 9:17 AM, Adam Vitkovsky <Adam.Vitkovsky at gamma.co.uk> wrote:

>> Satish Patel
>> Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 10:14 PM
>> To: Cisco Network Service Providers
>> Subject: [c-nsp] BGP default vs BGP full
>> 
>> Just wonder what would be the advantage and disadvantage of running BGP
>> full vs default route.
>> 
>> We have single ISP connection and ISP decided to just run default route over
>> BGP instead full.
> Just make sure the default route they advertise is generated based on a condition, to make sure their router has more specific routes (connectivity to core) before it advertises the default route to you.
> But with just one upstream link you can just point a static default route at them.
> 
> 
> adam
> 
> 
> 
>        Adam Vitkovsky
>        IP Engineer
> 
> T:      0333 006 5936
> E:      Adam.Vitkovsky at gamma.co.uk
> W:      www.gamma.co.uk
> 
> This is an email from Gamma Telecom Ltd, trading as “Gamma”. The contents of this email are confidential to the ordinary user of the email address to which it was addressed. This email is not intended to create any legal relationship. No one else may place any reliance upon it, or copy or forward all or any of it in any form (unless otherwise notified). If you receive this email in error, please accept our apologies, we would be obliged if you would telephone our postmaster on +44 (0) 808 178 9652 or email postmaster at gamma.co.uk
> 
> Gamma Telecom Limited, a company incorporated in England and Wales, with limited liability, with registered number 04340834, and whose registered office is at 5 Fleet Place London EC4M 7RD and whose principal place of business is at Kings House, Kings Road West, Newbury, Berkshire, RG14 5BY.
> 
>