[c-nsp] LNS Alternatives

Patrick Cole z at amused.net
Sat May 21 21:52:21 EDT 2016


I have used l2tpns in a cluster successfully in the past for this.  
It's capable of doing 65k sessions per cluster if you throw enough
nodes at it.

The codebase is fairly stable and has been around for a long time
but isn't really maintained anymore.

We recently moved to the ASR1k platform for BRAS and had similar 
gripes over the licensing prices, but just so you know the licenses
are honesty based on the ASR1k, the box will run at any license
level once you accept the EULA, but don't expect TAC to be jumping
to support you when your unlicensed features don't work.

We ended up talking direct to a local Cisco rep and they were able 
to get us fully licensed boxes for the right price point.

Regards,

Patrick

Sun, May 22, 2016 at 12:32:17AM +0000, CiscoNSP List wrote:


> Hi Everyone,
> 
> 
> We have around 5 POPs that need to terminate DSL tails, so require LNS - historically, we have done this on 7200's, now with 7200 basically EOLd, we are looking at the ASR1K's, but the broadband licensing on them is heinously expensive...Just wondering what others are using as an alternative?  We make very little margin on DSL tails, so if we had to go down the path of ASR1K/Broadband license it would take a very very long time to recoup license costs.
> 
> 
> Ive had a hunt around for Linux-based options, but all the ones Ive found are from quite a few years back, and dont appear to be under active development?
> 
> 
> Thanks in advance for any other suggestions.
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 

-- 
Patrick Cole <z at wwwires.com>
Senior Network Specialist
World Without Wires
PO Box 869. Palm Beach, QLD, 4221
Ph:  0410 626 630


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list