[c-nsp] LNS Alternatives

[CiscoNSP List]

Cheers Raphael - Wasnt aware of the vrf complexities.....this would hurt us significantly, as 70-80% of our DSL tails are in vrf's 

________________________________________
From: cisco-nsp <cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net> on behalf of raf <raph at futomaki.net>
Sent: Monday, 23 May 2016 7:39 PM
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] LNS Alternatives

I would also recommend to have a look at openl2tp.

Software LNS are a good solution if you only need basic features. If you
want to separate user in vrf/context it was a bit more complicated, as
you have to dedicate instance by vrf. but nothing impossible.
So the choice is as always, a relative expensive, but good hardware
platform, or a home solution which need much more engineering.

Or you can mix the two approach, I got a friend who handle 10K of
subscribers using a cluster of X c890 if I remember correctly.

Regards,

--
Raphael Mazelier


Le 22/05/2016 à 03:52, Patrick Cole a écrit :
> I have used l2tpns in a cluster successfully in the past for this.
> It's capable of doing 65k sessions per cluster if you throw enough
> nodes at it.
>
> The codebase is fairly stable and has been around for a long time
> but isn't really maintained anymore.
>
> We recently moved to the ASR1k platform for BRAS and had similar
> gripes over the licensing prices, but just so you know the licenses
> are honesty based on the ASR1k, the box will run at any license
> level once you accept the EULA, but don't expect TAC to be jumping
> to support you when your unlicensed features don't work.
>
> We ended up talking direct to a local Cisco rep and they were able
> to get us fully licensed boxes for the right price point.
>
> Regards,
>
> Patrick
>
>

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/