[c-nsp] udld fail ?

[james list]

yes, in general I see your points, I was wondering if there could be a
reasonable reason for the mentioned behaviour

2016-05-31 16:33 GMT+02:00 Nick Hilliard <nick at foobar.org>:

> james list wrote:
> > Apparently the Cisco gear has disabled one out of the two ten giga
> > interface after some flapping of the other one and due to UDLD that is
> > currently non configured as aggressive nor bidirectional (not supported
> by
> > Juniper gear).
> >
> > Among the two gears LACP fast is running.
> >
> > I kindly ask any feedback if it's something already experienced by
> somebody.
>
> udld is proprietary and non-interoperable technology.  One vendor's
> implementation will not work with another's.  Sometimes, a vendor's
> implementation will not interoperate with other equipment from the same
> vendor.  You need to disable udld on the c6500.
>
> Nick
>
>