[c-nsp] Rec for full-table multi-peer bgp router?

Gert Doering gert at greenie.muc.de
Wed Nov 30 11:43:55 EST 2016


Hi,

On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 04:41:29PM +0000, David Hubbard wrote:
> I don???t need too much in the way of port density per device; eight or ten SFP+ ports would be fine, and if QSFP is available that would be a bonus, but not one I???d be willing to pay more for at this point.  Each router typically talks to one other ibgp, three others ospf/ospfv3, two or three ebgp peers sending full tables.  Nothing too exciting.

ASR9001 sounds like it would do what you want (goes up to 12x 10GE, though
only 4 of them are SFP+, the rest is XFP).  Fastest BGP implementation
I've ever seen in a "vendor box router".

gert

-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 630 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20161130/76cf51bd/attachment.sig>


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list