[c-nsp] Sup2 (Not Sup2T) on a 6513 (NON-E)

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 08:23:47PM +0000, Nick Cutting wrote:
> Thank you for the replies
> Seems even a single 3560v1 is better than this supervisor.

Yes.  The Sup2 is something like 15 years old, and just not up to
GigE stuff.  (On the plus side, it's extremely robust and reliable - 
which is exactly why you're facing this question at all today.  Just
how much other IT gear is there that just chugs along happily for
over 10 years, and just refuses to break?)

We're just now getting rid of our last 6500/Sup1A CatOS boxes...
(still serving customers on 100Mbit ports, and not showing any signs
of old age - but *people* no longer remember CatOS, so it's time to
close that chapter)

gert
-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 273 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20160909/a158ffef/attachment.sig>