[c-nsp] STP and PVST..

Nick Cutting ncutting at edgetg.com
Wed Apr 19 16:42:57 EDT 2017


Once you get all devices to agree on the root bridge for RPVST+ (make sure vlan1 is allowed on the inter-vendor trunks) , 

You will also need for fast failover, to configure the downstream ports (servers / esx hosts etc) must be running portfast / portfast trunk. This stops them from re-converging when there is an upstream failure (which should be sub-second failover for R(PV)STP)

What is the other vendor and model number? 
Rapid should work for almost every vendor Except those old HP 5900's, which you must use MST.


-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Catalin Dominte
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2017 7:21 AM
To: Nicolas KARP <liste at karp.fr>; Ambedkar <p.ambedkar at gmail.com>
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] STP and PVST..

Yes, until you realise that Cisco MSTP does not talk to Juniper MSTP for some odd reason! :)


*Catalin Dominte | Senior Network Consultant*

Nocsult Ltd  | 11 Castle Hill  |  Maidenhead  |  Berkshire  |  SL6 4AA  |
 Phone:  +44 (0)1628 302 007

VAT registration number: GB 180957674  |  Company registration number:
08886349
P Please consider the environment - Do you really need to print this email?

THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and its attachments from all computers.

On 19 April 2017 at 08:25:21, Nicolas KARP (liste at karp.fr) wrote:

Hello Ambedkar,

Are you able to use MSTP ? That's the standard between Cisco and Non Cisco switches :
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/lan-switching/spanning-tree-protocol/24248-147.html

Best Regards,

Nick



2017-04-19 5:53 GMT+02:00 Ambedkar <p.ambedkar at gmail.com>:

> Namaskaram,
> I am having a problem of inter-operability of Cisco switches and
Non-Cisco
> switches.
>
> The configuration as follows
>
> Cisco Switches:
> PVST and RPVST (Proprietary protocols)
>
> Non-Cisco Switches:
> STP and RSTP (Open Standard)
>
> In STP/RSTP, both the Cisco and Non-Cisco switches are becoming Root 
> bridges, and when failover has to take place, the time to converge is
more.
> I guess BPDU packets are not exchanged properly.
>
> Any help how to resolve this issue..
>
> Thanks
> P Ambedkar
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net 
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list