[c-nsp] ASR 1k vs 9k as a non-transit BGP router with full tables?

[Mark Tinka]

On 2/Aug/17 12:10, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:

> So, any remarks about the 1002?

It depends; there are different ASR1002's.

The ASR1002-X and the ASR1002-HX.

The ASR1002-X is older, and runs the RP1, which is the slower one. We
use them for a bit of peering, and it's not bad - certainly better than
the MX80 and MX104's RE's.

The ASR1002-HX is on RP2.

Stay away from the ASR1002 or ASR1002-F. Those are too old for life.

In general, I'd say focus on the RP2 and RP3 chassis.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20170802/a926b468/attachment.sig>