[c-nsp] ASR 1k vs 9k as a non-transit BGP router with full tables?

Saku Ytti saku at ytti.fi
Wed Aug 2 07:38:35 EDT 2017

On 2 August 2017 at 14:34, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka at seacom.mu> wrote:

> The box was designed to compete with the ASR1000, which offers Ethernet
> + non-Ethernet versatility.

This would surprise me very much. I see MX80/MX104 as ASR9001
competitor. If JNPR thought they were competing with ASR1k, they are
extremely confused. ASR1k does NAPT, statefull firewall, encryption
etc. Juniper really doesn't have ASR1k competitor, but SRX is closer
than MX.


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list