[c-nsp] OSPF equal cost load balancing

CiscoNSP List CiscoNSP_list at hotmail.com
Thu Aug 31 18:55:20 EDT 2017

Hmm - It cant be - Its not just to one nexthop that all the traffic is heading....i.e there are 3 or 4 destination routers (2 ASR1001s, and the ME3600 (2 of those)...so 4 next-hop addresses....we cant be that unlucky that every one of those addresses is being mapped to gi0/0/20...no, just checked, and it arbitrarily changes based on src ip....but, that could be just cef miss-reporting. ....very frustrating.

From: cisco-nsp <cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net> on behalf of CiscoNSP List <CiscoNSP_list at hotmail.com>
Sent: Friday, 1 September 2017 8:45 AM
To: Aaron Gould; 'James Bensley'; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] OSPF equal cost load balancing

Thanks Aaron....thats what Im going to try shortly.....Very strange how cef exact route reports it as load sharing, but it obviously isnt.....and the next-hop link you provided, I have to read, but I think that is what is happening...

From: Aaron Gould <aaron1 at gvtc.com>
Sent: Friday, 1 September 2017 6:37 AM
To: 'CiscoNSP List'; 'James Bensley'; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] OSPF equal cost load balancing

In my mpls cloud I usually would lag dual gige's together to feed my PE
boxes with more bandwidth.  Worked well for me


cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
cisco-nsp Info Page - puck.nether.net<https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp>
To see the collection of prior postings to the list, visit the cisco-nsp Archives. Using cisco-nsp: To post a message to all the list members, send ...

archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list