[c-nsp] FIB insertion issues on Sup2T routers
"Rolf Hanßen"
nsp at rhanssen.de
Fri Dec 1 07:16:25 EST 2017
Hello,
I had 3 incidents within a week in which Sup2T-XL routers switched to
software forwarding.
I.e. log says:
%MLSCEF-4-FIB_TCAM_INSERT_FAIL: FIB entry insertion into tcam failed, one
IPv4 route may be absent from hardware table
Was fixed by a reboot in each case.
Uptime differs (several weeks up to years), chassis differ (6509E/7609S),
all routers run 15.1(2)SY1.
Number of total routes is not close to the edge:
#sh platform hardware cef summary
Total routes: 709683
IPv4 unicast routes: 664027
IPv4 non-vrf routes: 664027
IPv4 vrf routes: 0
IPv4 multicast routes: 3
IPv6 unicast routes: 45650
IPv6 global routes: 45649
IPv6 non-vrf routes: 45649
IPv6 vrf routes: 0
IPv6 link-local routes: 1
IPv6 multicast routes: 1
mpls routes: 1
mpls-vpn routes: 0
eompls-l2 routes: 1
eom-ipv4-mcast routes: 0
eom-ipv6-mcast routes: 0
#sh platform hardware cef maximum-routes
Fib-size: 1024k (1048576), shared-size: 1016k (1040384),
shared-usage: 735k(753326)
Protocol Max-routes Use-shared-region Dedicated
-------- ---------- ----------------- ---------
IPV4 1017k Yes 1k
IPV4-MCAST 1017k Yes 1k
IPV6 1017k Yes 1k
IPV6-MCAST 1017k Yes 1k
MPLS 1017k Yes 1k
EoMPLS 1017k Yes 1k
VPLS-IPV4-MCAST 1017k Yes 1k
VPLS-IPV6-MCAST 1017k Yes 1k
They did not have that issue the same time and receive the same routes
that also other Sup2T routers (that did not have that issue) receive, so I
do not expect this to be result of a short wave of routes learned from
peers/uplinks.
Did anyone else have that issue?
Any hints how to find the cause (without support contract)?
kind regards
Rolf
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list