[c-nsp] ASR920 S vs SP train?

[Tim Durack]

For the record, 3.18SP fixes this vulnerability:

https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20160804-wedge



On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 1:17 PM Tim Durack <tdurack at gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks. The mystery of software trains...
>
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 10:40 AM Tim Cooper <lists at coop3r.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 4 Jan 2017, at 13:34, Tim Durack <tdurack at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Anyone know the difference between the S and SP train for ASR920?
>
> When I asked Cisco I was told that 3.18SP is essentially what was
> originally to be 3.19S but no more detail than that. Not clear if S and SP
> are going to run side by side and I never really pushed it any further
> because we still run 3.16.4 in production anyway
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>