[c-nsp] ospf database size - affects that underlying transport mtu might have

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 11:50:51AM -0600, Aaron Gould wrote:
> This is a *single area* ospf environment, that has been stable for years..
> But now suddenly is having issues with new ospf neightbor adjacencies ,
> which are riding a 3rd party transport network 

Which is pretty standard if you configure a larger MTU than the provider
is giving you.  OSPF is filling up handshake packets to the configured MTU
(always) so if max-MTU packets are lost, no OSPF adjacencies.

gert
-- 
now what should I write here...

Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 630 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20171122/43da6b5e/attachment.sig>