[c-nsp] ISIS/BFD Monitoring
Alex K.
nsp.lists at gmail.com
Sat Sep 16 03:11:59 EDT 2017
Thank you Alan.
RouteExplorer indeed seems to be appropriate. Anyone here have been using
it and can share their experience?
בתאריך 15 בספט' 2017 2:23 PM, "Alan Buxey" <alan.buxey at gmail.com> כתב:
> RouteExplorer is a nice tool
>
> (Commercial, from Packet Design)
>
>
>
> On 15 Sep 2017 10:50 am, "Alex K." <nsp.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> A customer of mine, ran into interesting problem - his monitoring software
>> unable to provide him with a meaningful alert, in case a link goes down.
>>
>> As an ISP, they have lots of links, they run ISIS/BFD on all of them but,
>> as it regularly happens with carriers, layer 2 never actually goes down
>> (apart from SDH and dark fiber links, but those are few).
>>
>> I tested their equipment (mainly Cisco gear) and all it generates, is a
>> trap wich basically say - "ISIS sission 657843347853325524854 went down".
>>
>> What they looking for, is a monitoring system, which on the scenario
>> above,
>> is able to provide the NOC team with a meaningful alert, such as: "ISIS
>> status on interface <interface description> changed to down. Please notify
>> the network team".
>>
>> Any suggestions and sharing of personal experience will be appreciated.
>>
>> Thank you.
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list