[c-nsp] ISIS Fast Convergence (ASR920?)

[Lukas Tribus]

Hello,


On 28 February 2018 at 19:31, Jason Lixfeld <jason at lixfeld.ca> wrote:

> Hey,
>
> There seem to be some conflicting suggestions for ISIS fast convergence
> timers, and I can’t seem to understand why that would be.  The former
> example is ISIS in a LFA FRR environment, the latter is from a general best
> practise guide. I can’t imagine LFA FRR or not would matter to the best
> practise would it?
>

While the former document is for the ASR920, the latter has been written
with the ASR1000 in mind, I think that is the main difference here.


(you will see this mail twice Jason; I messed up my From: and the list
rejected it)


cheers,
lukas